The clean energy transition relies on critical raw materials. Electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, defence systems and the semiconductor supply chain all depend on gold, palladium, copper and rare earth elements, which Europe currently imports at a significant cost and with considerable strategic risk. Demand for these materials is set to grow dramatically over the next decade, yet Europe continues to discard its own domestic supply.
Europe generates around 12 million tonnes of electronic waste each year. Embedded in that waste is a recoverable reserve of the very critical raw materials that Europe claims it cannot afford to be without. Currently, only 36% of this waste is recycled, down from 41% in 2012, with the rest ending up in landfill, being incinerated, or being exported outside the EU. The materials that leave do not come back. This is not a waste management failure. It is a strategic failure.
The circular economy cannot deliver on critical raw material (CRM) targets without viable recovery technology.
Much of the current policy conversation around CRM security focuses, correctly, on diversifying import sources, securing mining agreements and building processing capacity. However, a parallel priority that receives far less attention is the recovery of materials already embedded in products that Europeans have bought, used and discarded.
Conventional e-waste recycling is not equipped to close this gap. Smelting-based processes only recover 60–70% of valuable metals, consume enormous amounts of energy and generate toxic emissions. The economics are marginal. The environmental case is weak. Furthermore, these processes leave behind precisely the high-value fractions that European industry needs most: precious metals, rare earths and battery materials.
To achieve the targets set out in the Critical Raw Materials Act for domestic recycled content by 2030, we need to collect more e-waste and process it using technology that can extract the materials inside. Such technology now exists.
Advanced recovery technology can bridge the gap between ambition and reality.
The RETURN project is showing that a new generation of e-waste processing can achieve what conventional smelting cannot. Using an eco-friendly liquid chemistry process called Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) ionometallurgy, which operates at near-ambient temperatures, RETURN recovers over 99% of precious and critical metals from waste printed circuit boards. This process results in zero Scope 1 emissions and a 69% reduction in CO₂ compared to smelting. The facility footprint is approximately 400 square metres. The capital requirement is a fraction of that required for a primary mining operation.
This is not an experiment. It is a pre-commercial process being demonstrated on a large scale as part of a Horizon Europe Innovation Action project, with a consortium of partners spanning green chemistry, AI-driven sorting, digital infrastructure and large-scale recycling operations. The first commercial installation is in active development.
The implications for EU policy are clear: the processing of e-waste for critical raw materials using domestic, low-emission, high-recovery methods is technically and commercially viable. The question is whether policy frameworks will accelerate or impede its deployment.
Digital infrastructure is the missing layer in the circular critical raw materials (CRM) value chain. Recovery technology alone is insufficient. One of the structural weaknesses in Europe’s e-waste sector is the lack of reliable data on the materials present in collected devices, their quantities and their condition. Without this information, sorting becomes inefficient, processing becomes unpredictable and the recovered materials lack the traceability that is increasingly required by downstream manufacturers.
RETURN is developing this layer alongside the physical process. Digital Product Passports (DPPs), linked to a Dynamic Digital Marketplace, create verifiable records of material content, processing history and quality standards. These passports enable recovered CRMs to re-enter EU supply chains with the same transparency and trust that manufacturers demand from primary sources.
The ESPR (Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation) is moving in exactly this direction. Mandating DPPs for electronics creates the data infrastructure that makes high-efficiency recovery economically viable at scale. The two policies — the ESPR and the CRMA — are mutually reinforcing, but only if their implementation timelines are aligned and the standards developed are interoperable across the entire electronics value chain.
What Europe needs now is policy alignment, not just ambition.
Europe has the technology, industrial base and regulatory framework to lead the world in the recovery of critical raw materials from electronics. Three things are needed to realise this potential.
Firstly, WEEE collection and processing targets must be enforced with the same seriousness as production-side regulations. Targets that are set but not met are not targets – they are aspirations. The gap between the EU’s stated recycling ambitions and its actual performance has widened over the past decade. Closing this gap requires binding downstream accountability.
Secondly, regulatory frameworks must recognise advanced recovery processes as strategically equivalent to primary mining. Recovering a tonne of gold from e-waste at 99% purity with near-zero emissions contributes as much to European raw material security as extracting a tonne from the ground. Policy instruments, including CRMA domestic content targets and state aid frameworks, should reflect this equivalence.
Thirdly, the DPP ecosystem must be developed urgently and at the appropriate level of granularity. Broad commitments to traceability are insufficient. Data models, interoperability standards and governance frameworks must be defined in time for today’s product designers – the products they design will enter the waste stream in five to ten years. The decisions made now will determine whether future e-waste can be recovered.
Europe cannot afford to keep discarding its domestic CRMA reserve. The technology to recover it is ready. What remains to be secured is the policy alignment to deploy it at scale.